Cases 81 - 90 of 9,226
James v. Lumpkin
as 24-10141
Petitioner:
Anthony Donnell James
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
El-Bey v. Lumpkin
as 24-10303
Petitioner:
Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 24-40210
Petitioner:
Bakari Abdul Brown
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. FCI Texarkana Warden
as 24-40142
Petitioner:
Curtis Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and FCI Texarkana Warden
Cole v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Luther Elvis Cole
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponce v. Lumpkin
as 24-20134
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ponce
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Belmont v. Lumpkin
as 24-50102
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Belmont
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Banks v. Lumpkin
as 24-50092
Petitioner:
Jakroi Allen Banks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 24-70002
Petitioner:
Amos Wells
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Little v. Lumpkin
as 24-10121
Petitioner:
Paul La'Mark Little
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
