Cases 1 - 10 of 739
Alcozer v. Ortiz
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Alcozer
Defendant:
Jesse Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ismael Ortiz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ortiz v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Anthony Ortiz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta, Jr. v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raul Anthony Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Detention Officer Ortiz, Detention Officer Salazar, Sgt. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz-Castillo v. Calcasieu Correctional Center et al
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Antonia Ortiz-Castillo
Defendant:
Calcasieu Correctional Center and Tony Mancuso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Pierce v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Jasmine Garcia, Jonathon J. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. Officer Ortiz
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lewis Earl Perkins
Defendant:
Officer Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
