Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Cantu v. USA
as 3:2024cv01217
Petitioner:
Christopher Joe Cantu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01124
Petitioner:
Christopher Cantu-Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Carlos Mario Cantu-Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Quiroz v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Estaban Cantu Quiroz
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Warden Flistman and Doctor Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu Vela v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Horacio Cantu Vela
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v Val Verde Detention Center, et al
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Julian Rodriguez, Jr
Defendant:
U.S. District Court - Western District of Texas, Unnamed Government Agents, Val Verde Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv04767
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp, Amber Ochoa, William J Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v Val Verde Detention Center, et al
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Julian Rodriguez, Jr
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Unnamed Government Agents, Val Verde Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. County of DeWitt et al
as 4:2023cv04175
Plaintiff:
Aran Nicholas Rodriguez
Defendant:
County of DeWitt, C. Cantu, Jesse Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
