Cases 1 - 10 of 2,332
Hernandez v. Gutierrez
as 24-50422
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Chair Person; Pardon & Paroles, Eric J. R. Nichols, Chair Person; Texas Board Department of Criminal Justice, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Rosalez
as 5:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
Robert Timothy Blake
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGrath v. TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. McGrath
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. American Municipal Services et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jackson
Defendant:
American Municipal Services, Larry Bergman, Greg Pitchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rehart v. TDCJ
as 24-10354
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Rehart
Defendant:
TDCJ, Danny C. Diaz, Cellmate at TDCJ, OIfficer FNU Blackshire, Officer at TDCJ and others
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deary v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Reginald Deary
Defendant:
B. Collier, B. Reitsma, T. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Saxton
as 24-40223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Rhodes
Defendant:
Garrett Saxton, Practice Manager, Rachel Burleson, Facility Nurse Manager, Tonia G. McNaughton, Nurse Practitioner and others
Peters v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
