Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 297
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Arnold Aguirre
Defendant: Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN***
as 6:2024cv00123
Petitioner: Andrew Burke
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00124
Petitioner: Andrew Burke
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner: Andrew Burke
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Andrew Burke
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Payne et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: James Alan Burke, Jr.
Defendant: James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke v. Mundin
as 24-20103
Plaintiff: Andrew Burke
Defendant: Joann Mundin, Dawn Simmons, Nurse Practitioner, Lieutenant Reiser and others
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00527
Petitioner: Andrew Burke
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Gary Smith
Defendant: Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Burk et al
as 5:2023cv00305
Plaintiff: John Gabriel Rios
Defendant: FNU Burk, M. Williams, J. Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?