Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Varnado v. Huffman et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Carlos Varnado
Defendant:
Brad Huffman, Ronald King, Unknown Canale and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Carlos Eugene Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Varnado v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Carlos Varnado
Defendant:
John Doe and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Scott County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2023cv02980
Plaintiff:
Carlos Smith
Defendant:
Scott County Sheriff's Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Moore
Respondent:
Jeffery B. Belk, Nathan Burl Cain, MDOC Records Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Moore
Defendant:
Jeffery B. Belk, Nathan Burl Cain, MDOC Records Director and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Moore
Defendant:
Jeffery B. Belk, Nathan Burl Cain, MDOC Records Director and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Does
as 3:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rivera
Defendant:
Does
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. USA
as 3:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Carlos Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
