Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00489
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Martin v. Live Oak
as 23-40254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant / Appellee:
Live Oak County Jail, Live Oak County Sheriffs Department, Cara Kay Joiner Barton and others
Martin v. Live Oak County Jail
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant:
Live Oak County Jail, Daniel Coban Barton, Jailer Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Live Oak County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00156
Defendant:
Daniel Coban Barton, Live Oak County Jail, Live Oak County Sheriffs Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Burton
as 4:2019cv01044
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tyrone Thomas
Defendant:
Cara Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Montgomery County et al
as 1:2018cv00348
Defendant:
9th Appeals Court, Cara Wood, Montgomery County and others
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starcher v. Wood et al
as 4:2018cv02361
Defendant:
Cara Wood, Jason Larman, Barbara Gladden Adamick and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Starcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Freeman v. E. Frost, et al
as 18-10675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE E. SCOTT FROST, LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CARA HANNA, Attorney General and others
Freeman v. Frost et al
as 1:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
E. Scott Frost, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Cara Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00265
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
