Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Montgomery v. State of Texas
as 24-50010
Plaintiff:
John Cornelius Montgomery
Defendant:
State of Texas, District Attorney's Office, McLennan County District Attorney's Office, McLennan County Jail and others
Montgomery v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
John Cornelius Montgomery
Defendant:
The State of Texas, DA Office, McLennan County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayden v. Hudson et al
as 6:2018cv00387
Defendant:
Kayla Nicholson and David Hudson
Plaintiff:
Harlin Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sias v. Rasor et al
as 6:2017cv00521
Plaintiff:
Donald L Sias
Defendant:
Unknown Rasor, David Hudson and Gary Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2015cv02661
Petitioner:
Shane Matthew Nettles
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID, Jacqueline Dickerson and David Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eduardo Sanchez v. Jeffery Calfee, et al
as 13-41097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDUARDO SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY CALFEE, DAVID HUDSON, LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS JONES and others
Sanchez v. Calfee et al
as 5:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Sanchez
Defendant:
Jeffery Calfee, David Hudson, Williams Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rich et al
as 6:2011cv00518
Plaintiff:
Cecil Clayton Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Steven Rich, Jennifer Love, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thaler et al
as 5:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
John Johnson, III
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, David Hudson, FNU McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarrance Whitlock v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 11-40337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARRANCE DARON WHITLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HUDSON, Captain, Warden, Telford Unit, STEPHEN ROCKWELL, Sergeant, Compliance and Safety Officer, A. JENKENS, Compliance and Safety Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
