Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Lafayette v. Epps et al
as 4:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lafayette
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, David Petrie, Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Marco Sanchez Rice
Defendant:
Clarissa Williams, T. Orr, Verlena Flaggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Bryant et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Marshall Fisher, Raymond T. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
London Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Earnest Lee, Kathryn McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Wilson, Jr. v. Ron King, et al
as 14-60654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY EARL WILSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RON KING, DAVID PETRIE, MICHAEL TURNER and others
Wilson v. King et al
as 4:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ron King, David Petrie, Michael Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Mixon v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RONALD KING, Superintendant, J. KIRKWOOD, Mailroom Supervisor and others
Winding v. Graham et al
as 3:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Joyce Graham , E. L. Sparkman, David Petrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Vincent et al
as 3:2013cv00425
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Leonard Vincent, David Petrie, Joyce Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Harbin et al
as 3:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
A. Harbin , C. Dykes , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
