Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00850
Petitioner: David Ray Conley, III
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner: David Ray Conley, III
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00867
Petitioner: David Ray Conley, III
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Lumpkin
as 23-10121
Petitioner / Appellant: David Ray Baker
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Johnson
as 22-30567
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: David Ray Johnson
Atwood v. Christopher We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-20310
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Ray Atwood
Defendant / Appellee: Kate E. Christopher, Executive Director Bryan Collier, Warden Steve McClarin and others
Baker v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00624
Petitioner: David Ray Baker
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boswell v. Jones
as 5:2022cv01351
Plaintiff: David Ray Boswell
Defendant: Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2022cv01305
Petitioner: David Ray Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Atwood v. Christopher et al
as 4:2020cv01368
Plaintiff: David Ray Atwood
Defendant: Captain Cory Webb, Warden Steve McClarin, Ex Director Bryon Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?