Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Shepard v. Brazos County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01913
Petitioner:
Tyrone Radale Shepard
Respondent:
Brazos County Sheriff Department and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGee v. Dicky
as 4:2024cv01482
Petitioner:
JorCorey Deshawn McGee
Respondent:
Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Greening et al
as 4:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Ramirez
Defendant:
Craig Alan Greening, Wayne Dicky, Jessica Escue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sheriff, Wayne Dicky
as 5:2023cv01530
Petitioner:
Earnest Key Johnson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Dicky
as 4:2023cv01948
Petitioner:
Earnest K. Johnson
Respondent:
Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bankenbush Rivera v. Dicky
as 4:2022cv02200
Petitioner:
Heather Renee Bankenbush Rivera
Respondent:
Sheriff Wayne Dicky and Philip Mclemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Dicky et al
as 4:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Terry D Gray
Defendant:
Wayne Dicky, Paul Martinez, Kevin Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naquin v. Jack et al
as 2:2020cv00548
Defendant:
Maj. Bergeron, Coby Dean, Dicky Haydel and others
Plaintiff:
Roland J. Naquin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2016cv16593
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jerome Ross
Defendant:
Jerry J Larpenter, Claude Triche, Dicky Haydel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley v. Terrebonne Parish Jail Medical Department et al
as 2:2016cv15862
Plaintiff:
Mario McKinley
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Jail Medical Department, Capt Bergron, Claude Triche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
