Cases 1 - 10 of 2,135
De Mandueno Garcia v. USP Victorville
as 4:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
Felipe De Mandueno Garcia and Carlos Jesus Madueno
Respondent:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stewart v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stewart
Defendant:
S. Garcia, Salvador Chapa, Eulalia Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Unknown Defendant
as 24-40328
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Mail Department, Grievance Department and others
Garcia Sanchez v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Oscar Santiago Garcia Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garcia v. Lumpkin; Do not docket in 2:24-cv-110. Case is consolidated under 2:24-cv-108.
as 2:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Antoino Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Unknown Staff
as 24-40318
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff, Director FNU Parker, U S Government and others
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40314
Petitioner:
Antonio A. Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40306
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
