Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Cerda et al
as 5:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Edwin James Johnson
Defendant:
Rolando Cerda, Ryan F. King and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Grievance Board Supv Unknown
as 4:2022cv03033
Plaintiff:
Ivory James Johnson
Defendant:
Grievance Board Supv Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tyler
as 4:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Ivory James Johnson
Defendant:
Sergeant Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hooper
as 1:2022cv01498
Plaintiff:
James Craig Johnson, James Craig Johnson, Jr, James Craig Jackson, Jr and others
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center
as 5:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jefferson et al
as 4:2021cv03011
Plaintiff:
Ivory James Johnson
Defendant:
Sergeant Jefferson, Pod Deputy Unknown, Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Detective Failed to Provide Name et al
as 4:2021cv02745
Plaintiff:
Ivory James Johnson
Defendant:
Detective Failed to Provide Name, Lance Hamm, Sergant Clinton W Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Harris County et al
as 4:2021cv01558
Defendant:
Harris County, Lance Hamm, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Ivory James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
