Cases 1 - 10 of 2,297
Fortman v. Gregg County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cody Dewayne Fortman
Defendant:
Gregg County Sheriff's Office and Kevin Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reaves v. Smith
as 3:2024cv01631
Petitioner:
Samuel Lyn Reaves
Respondent:
Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Samuel Lyn Reaves
Respondent:
Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheffield v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01581
Petitioner:
Kevin Dale Sheffield
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Montford Unit Officials
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anderson
Defendant:
Montford Unit Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shead et al v. State of Texas Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Travarus Shead, Enrique Guerra and Barry Emmett
Defendant:
State of Texas Corporation, Greg Abbot, TDCJ Corporation and others
Petitioner:
George Thomas and Louis Johnson
Not Yet Classified:
Kevin Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Tidwell
as 24-10359
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kelly Joe Bates
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeremy Tidwell, Corporal Martin Rosas and Officer Davian Moore
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01547
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simpson v. Montford Unit Officials
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Scott Simpson, Clark Beckett, Carlton Mack and others
Defendant:
Montford Unit Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Abebe et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dean Bennett
Defendant:
FNU Abebe and Dr. Christopher S Eddleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
