Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Earl Cooper v. L. Doyle, et al
as 17-40998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL DANIEL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DOYLE, Warden, SAMUEL A. OJO, Correctional Officer, SHAYLA B. HEBERT, Correctional Officer and others
McClure v. Doyle et al
as 2:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant:
L. Doyle, J Webb, J Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Cooper v. L. Doyle, et al
as 17-40759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL DANIEL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DOYLE, Warden, SAMUEL A. OJO, Correctional Officer, SHAYLA B. HEBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Havies v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Petitioner:
Alonzo Havies
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, L. Doyle and FNU Correll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert McClure v. Bryan Collier, Executive Dir, et al
as 17-10351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, JANE/JOHN DOE, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Food Director, L. DOYLE, Senior Warden of Texas Department of Criminal Justice 'Robinson' (sic) Unit and others
McClure v. Collier, et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Robert T McClure
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jane/John Doe, L. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Doyle et al
as 3:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
Earl Daniel Cooper
Defendant:
L Doyle, Samuel A Ojo, Shayla B Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Boudreaux et al
as 4:2007cv02725
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Hernandez Diaz
Defendant:
Unidentified Boudreaux, Ms. Unidentified Simmon, B Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Boudreaux et al
as 9:2007cv00131
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Hernandez Diaz
Defendant:
Unidentified Boudreaux, Unidentified Simmon, B. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
