Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Paul
as 5:2020cv00030
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Petitioner:
Lance Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tisdale v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00571
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Petitioner:
Lance William Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TISDALE v. THALER et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Petitioner:
LANCE WILLIAM TISDALE
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lance Tisdale v. Board of Pardons and Parole, et al
as 09-50720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE WILLIAM TISDALE
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, TRAVIS COUNTY DIRECTORS and TRIAL AND APPELLATE COUNSEL
Lance Tisdale v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-50716
Petitioner - Appellant:
LANCE WILLIAM TISDALE
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Tisdale v. Board of Pardon & Paroles et al
as 6:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Lance William Tisdale
Defendant:
Board of Pardon & Paroles, Travis County Directors and Trial and Appellate Counsel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tisdale v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00078
Petitioner:
Lance William Tisdale
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tisdale v. Board of Pardon & Paroles et al
as 1:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
Lance William Tisdale
Defendant:
Board of Pardon & Paroles, Travis County Directors and Trial and Appellate Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tisdale v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00297
Petitioner:
Lance William Tisdale
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
