Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Scott v. Hattiesburg Police Department
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sam M. Scott
Defendant:
Hattiesburg Police Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donny M. Scott
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. The State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Donny M. Scott
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff Office
as 6:2021cv03158
Plaintiff:
Henry M Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Lafayette Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff Office (Medical Division)
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Henry M. Scott
Defendant:
Lafayette Parish Sheriff Office (Medical Division)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Rapides Parish Detention Center
as 1:2013cv02648
Plaintiff:
Marquis M Scott
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Rapides Parish Detention Center I et al
as 1:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
Marquis M Scott
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center I, Darzant, Creecy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Rapides Parish Detention Center II
as 1:2011cv02137
Plaintiff:
Marquis M Scott
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Rapides Parish Detention Center II et al
as 1:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
Marquis M Scott
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center II and Rapides Parish Detention Center III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. Scott et al
as 5:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Vonzell Casey
Defendant:
M. Scott, Bruce Pearson, Unknown McGregar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
