Cases 1 - 10 of 338
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01262
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Rigsby
as 4:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Bobby Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Brumley et al
as 4:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Caleb Brumley, Anothony Newton and Bobby D Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Brown
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Newton et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Anthony J. Newton, Bobby D. Rigsby and Caleb Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Felix Murphy, III
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
John Doe and State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. I.R.S.
as 4:2023cv04654
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earl Murphy, Sr. and Sh
Defendant:
I.R.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Cueto et al
as 5:2023cv01501
Petitioner:
David Preston Murphy
Respondent:
Edmundo Cueto and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shakouri v. Becker et al
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Shahram Shakouri
Defendant:
Scott Becker, John Rolater, Jennifer Edgeworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
