Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Martinez v. Bierman
as 5:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Michael Jesse Martinez
Defendant:
Officer David Bierman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gil v. Core
as 7:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Alonso Trinidad Gil
Defendant:
Officer David Core and Ector County Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Benaudt
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
David Earl Herrington
Defendant:
Officer David Benaudt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mateen v. LNU et al
as 1:2020cv00830
Plaintiff:
Shazizz Mateen and Reginald Bowers
Defendant:
Janice LNU, Officer David Mohr, LaGrange Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuffey v. Blackwell et al
as 6:2018cv00151
Defendant:
Warden David Blackwell, Corrections Officer Michael Brabham and Corrections Officer David A Foret
Plaintiff:
Douglas McGuffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowen v. Livingston et al
as 1:2014cv01088
Defendant:
Sr Warden Edgar Baker, OIG Lieutenant Jerry Bell, Asst Warden L. Berger and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenton McGowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Wilkerson, et al v. Richard Stalder, et al
as 13-31289
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT KING WILKERSON, ALBERT WOODFOX, VICTORY WALLACE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JERRY GOODWIN, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacity, JAMES ARNOLD, Deputy Warden of Security, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities, LONNIE NAIL, Lieutenant Colonel, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and others
Lago-Planas v. Rivera et al
as 3:2009cv01760
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Lago-Planas
Defendant:
Sergent Rivera and Officer David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
