Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ratliff v. Lumpkin
as 24-20333
Petitioner:
Michael Ratliff
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ratliff v. Home Depot Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Ratliff
Defendant:
Home Depot Corporation, Blake Delaune, Cox Cable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenewinkel v. Ratliff
as 23-11209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay E. Glenewinkel
Defendant / Appellee:
A. Ratliff, A Health Care Professional at FCI Seagoville, in his individual capacity
Blanton v. Ochoa et al
as 4:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Amber Ochoa, Stacey Barrera, Stacey Lammers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv04402
Petitioner:
Michael Ratliff
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gore v. League City Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dwain Gore
Defendant:
League City Police Department, Dickinson Police Department, Galveston County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Ms. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Julio A Zuniga
Defendant:
Ms. Mitchell, Bridgette Hayes, Willie Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff vs Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
David Clayton Ratliff
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratliff vs Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00019
Defendant:
David Clayton Ratliff
Respondent:
Warden C . Onwuka and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huerta v. Ratliff et al
as 3:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rey Jesus Huerta
Defendant:
Willie M Ratliff and Moises Villalobos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
