Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Whitaker v. Boneberg et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jamison Whitaker
Defendant:
Kevin Boneberg, Hope Sumrow, Robert Daniel Freisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burroughs v. USA
as 1:2019cv00461
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Daniel Burroughs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Spivey v. Fernandez et al
as 2:2018cv00438
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, R. Ryles and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Spivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Clark et al
as 2:2018cv00212
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Robert Grant, Juan Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Spivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Spivey v. Joseph Wilson, et al
as 18-40007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL SPIVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH WILSON, Warden, individually and in his official capacity, CHADRICK S. CLARK, Lieutenant, individually and in his official capacity, MARK DUKE, Transportation Officer, individually and in his official capacity and others
Spivey v. Clark et al
as 5:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Spivey
Defendant:
Chadrick Clark, Juan Rodriguez and Robert Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Wilson et al
as 5:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Spivey
Defendant:
Jordan Wilson, Francisco J Facio, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spivey v. Wilson et al
as 9:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Spivey
Defendant:
Jordan Wilson, Francisco J Facio, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Keys v. Candace Torres, et al
as 16-41518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL KEYS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER II CANDACE TORRES, CLERK 3 KIESHA COLLINS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION and others
White v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00009
Petitioner:
Robert Daniel White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
