Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hicks v. Davis
as 23-40109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Lee Hicks
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Individually and in official capacity, Warden Felipe Gonzalez, Individually and in official capacity, Assistant Warden Anthony Patrick, Individually and in official capacity and others
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 22-10252
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Robert Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hicks v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis, Lieutenant Ahmed Aboulmalik, Sargeant Robert Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Hicks, Don Overton, Eddie Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2019cv00064
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv00798
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. David Wade Correctional Center et al
as 5:2018cv01027
Defendant:
Tyronne Mays, Lonnie Nail, Secretary David Wade Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Seal et al
as 5:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Seal, Steve Haden, Nicki Mcoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Haulcy et al
as 5:2017cv01310
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy and Kidd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis
as 5:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Richerson
as 5:2016cv01232
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Kendall Richerson
Petitioner:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
