Cases 1 - 10 of 6,295
Majarro v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Noe Carrillo Majarro
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Coble et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
Michael D Coble, Gabriel D Martinez and Brenda K Laster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruff v. McCulloch et al
as 7:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D Ruff
Defendant:
Robin McCulloch, Lori Hodgkins, Atticus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 4:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Darrold Alexander
Defendant:
Correctional Managed Health Care, Dr. Lannette Linthicum, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Mark D. Terrell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bailey v. Albright
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
