Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
United States of America v. Maverick Arms 88 Shotgun caliber 12 SN: MV0334184 et al
as 1:2024cv00509
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Maverick Arms 88 Shotgun caliber 12 SN: MV0334184, Ruger 10/22 Rifle caliber 22 SN: 12746072, DPMS Inc. (Defense Procurement MFG. Services) Al 5 Rifle caliber 223 SN: F236703 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $8,084,395.29, more or less, in United States Currency seized from Bank of America Acct #586037101289, in the name of dba Child Health and Youth Lifelong Development, Janet P. Yamanaka Sole et al
as 5:2023cv01555
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: $8,084,395.29, more or less, in United States Currency seized from Bank of America Acct #586037101289, in the name of dba Child Health and Youth Lifelong Development, Janet P. Yamanaka Sole, $5,300,175.60, more or less, in United States Currency seized from Bank of America Acct #488087013292, in the name of dba Child Health and Youth Lifelong Development, Janet P. Yamanaka Sole, $4,078,017.38, more or less, in United States Currency seized from Bank of America Acct #488072001060, in the name of dba Child Health and Youth Lifelong Development, Janet P. Yamanaka Sole and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. One (1) Smith & Wesson Pistol, Model SW40VE, Cal: .40, Serial No. DTJ0056 et al
as 1:2022cv00156
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One (1) Smith & Wesson Pistol, Model SW40VE, Cal: .40, Serial No. DTJ0056, One (1) Smith & Wesson Pistol, Model M&P Bodyguard, Cal: .380, Serial No. KBY2450, Nineteen (19) Rounds of Ammunition, Cal: .40 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Conkle et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv02418
Plaintiff: Daniel Conkle and Harry Conkle
Defendant: Associate Chief Coun James D Ingram, United States of America, United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
USA v. ONE SMITH AND WESSON M&P RIFLE, SN: TJ16525; ET AL
as 5:2019cv00079
Defendant: ONE SMITH AND WESSON M&P RIFLE, SN: TJ16525; ET AL
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Ruger, Model M77, 270 Caliber Rifle, SN: 7962454 et al
as 2:2019cv00088
Defendant: H&R 1871, Model Pardner Pump, 12-Gauge Shotgun, SN: NZ627824, Ruger, Model M77, 270 Caliber Rifle, SN: 7962454, H&R, Model 999 Sportsman, 22-Caliber Revolver, SN: AP152939 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Sig Sauer (Sig-Arms) MPX-P Pistol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00941
Defendant: Sig Sauer (Sig-Arms) MPX-P Pistol, Heckler and Koch MP5 Machine Gun, Colt M4 Rifle and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Sig Sauer (Sig-Arms) MPX-P Pistol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00326
Defendant: Sig Sauer (Sig-Arms) MPX-P Pistol, Heckler and Koch MP5 Machine Gun, Colt M4 Rifle and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Richard Kelly Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Romarm SA/Cugir .762 caliber rifle, serial number 1985ZS5443 et al
as 6:2018cv00141
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Romarm SA/Cugir .762 caliber rifle, serial number 1985ZS5443, Smith & Wesson M&P 15 .223 caliber rifle, serial number 53570, Romarm SA/Cugir WASR .762 caliber rifle serial number 1-40225-2003 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Smith & Wesson, M&P 9mm Pistol, SN: HRH8039 and 32 Rounds Ammunition
as 6:2017cv00242
Defendant: Smith & Wesson, M&P 9mm Pistol, SN: HRH8039 and 32 Rounds Ammunition
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?