Cases 131 - 140 of 163
Silva v. Simbaki, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Silva
Defendant:
Simbaki, Ltd., Simbaki-I, Inc. and Phillip J. Wattel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Campbell v. Home Depot U S A Inc
as 3:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
Phillip Campbell
Defendant:
Home Depot U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez et al v. City of Austin
as 1:2011cv00471
Plaintiff:
Paul Alvarez, Glenn Anderson, Mike Benavides and others
Defendant:
City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tanner v. Phil Guilbeau Offshore, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Tanner
Defendant:
Phil Guilbeau Offshore, Inc., M/V "Spencer Phillip and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Hajdasz et al v. Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation
as 4:2011cv00909
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hajdasz and Hernan Valladares
Defendant:
Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Branum et al v. Valued Member Credit Union et al
as 3:2010cv00852
Plaintiff:
Jovita Branum , Stephanie Mills , Lindsey Poole and others
Defendant:
Valued Member Credit Union, Dana Richardson, Ike Rookmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stapp et al v. City of Big Spring, Texas
as 1:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Stapp , Michael Adams , Eric Barber and others
Defendant:
City of Big Spring, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Corbin v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00642
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., William F. Borne, Jeffrey Jeter and others
Plaintiff:
Wanda Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Phillips v. ENGlobal Corporation
as 4:2010cv02422
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
ENGlobal Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Phillips v. Warcomp, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Carl Phillips
Defendant:
Warcomp, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
