Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Maldonado et al v. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Ibarra, Matthew Dane Rinker, Billy Cambron and others
Defendant:
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc., Cobra Acquisitions, LLC, 5 Star Electric, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King Lloyd v. Double Oak Erosion, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04035
Plaintiff:
Carey King Lloyd
Defendant:
Double Oak Erosion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. King et al
as 4:2020cv00770
Defendant:
Patricia Atchley-Simms and Janice King
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustmark Life Insurance Company v. King et al
as 7:2020cv00219
Defendant:
ASHLEY MARIE KING and ERICA MARTINEZ WASDIN
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
King v. Southern Eagle Sales and Service,L.P.
as 2:2020cv00916
Defendant:
Southern Eagle Sales and Service,L.P.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan King
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
King v. Airgas Nitrogen Services, LLC
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
Airgas Nitrogen Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Debra King
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ornelas v. CD King Construction, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
Abel Ornelas
Defendant:
CD King Construction, LLC and Chadwick D. King
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. King et al
as 2:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Jeremy J True and Shylla V King
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chevez v. Gyro King, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03801
Defendant:
Gyro King 3, LLC, Gyro King, LLC, Gyro King 4, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Chevez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Qureshi et al v. King Fuels, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03400
Plaintiff:
Mehmood Qureshi and Jawad Ansari
Defendant:
Mohammed Naeem Niazi, Zaki Niazi, King Fuels, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
