Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Wolsefer v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 2:2017cv17726
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wolsefer
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Scott et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv02556
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott , Nathan Kleeb , Gabriella Earle and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd GP LLC and M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arturo Castro v. Precision Demolition, L.L.C., et al
as 17-10895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTURO CASTRO, and all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. 216 (b)
Defendant - Appellee:
PRECISION DEMOLITION, L.L.C., PRECISION DEMOLITION, L.P., HOLFORDS PRAIRIE PARTNERS, L.L.C. and others
Smith v. Plastic Express et al
as 4:2017cv01905
Plaintiff:
Kewayne Smith
Defendant:
Plastic Express and Raymond J. Hufnagel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Walker v. CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC, Laboratory Corporation of America , Medreview LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Serment v. Celanese Corporation
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Edward Serment , Aaron W Dorman , Maurice Donger and others
Defendant:
Celanese Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Collins Jr. v. Auto Frank
as 4:2016cv03350
Plaintiff:
Raymond Collins Jr.
Defendant:
Auto Frank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Sutton v. Custom Food Group, L.P.
as 1:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sutton
Defendant:
Custom Food Group, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KERR v. METAL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC d/b/a CURTISS-WRIGHT
as 4:2016cv02329
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND KERR
Defendant:
METAL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, LLC d/b/a CURTISS-WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Holt, et al vs. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Wesley Holt and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
