Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Roberson v. RWLS, LLC
as 1:2016cv00481
Defendant:
RWLS, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bryant Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Bryant v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas
as 3:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
Kemiya Bryant
Defendant:
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alston et al v. Debusk Services Group LLC
as 3:2016cv00031
Defendant:
Debusk Services Group LLC and Andrew Debusk
Plaintiff:
Tramaine Alston , Christopher Barnes , Joseph Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Bryant v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bryant
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abad et al v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company et al
as 7:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Gabriel, Marlow Hilton, Alexander Abad and others
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Daniels v. Production Management Industries L L C
as 6:2015cv02567
Plaintiff:
LaPatrick Daniels , Kirt Favors , Clyde Castle and others
Defendant:
Production Management Industries L L C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bryant v. Wilhelmsen Ships Service, Inc.
as 4:2015cv01733
Plaintiff:
Athena Bryant
Defendant:
Wilhelmsen Ships Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schultz v. Professional Home Health Care Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
Maria Schultz
Defendant:
Professional Home Health Care Inc and Consolata Bryant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edward Reyes, et al v. Billie Stone, et al
as 14-50311
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD F. REYES and BRYANT HOUSTON
Defendant - Appellant:
BILLIE ODELL STONE and STOBIL ENTEPRISE
Ho v. Xpress Pho LLC
as 3:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
Bryant Ho
Defendant:
Xpress Pho LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
