Cases 81 - 90 of 870
Payne v. TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Allen Payne
Defendant:
TNT Crane & Rigging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Sake Hibachi Sushi & Bar
as 21-11287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Catherine Williams, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. 216(b)
Defendant / Appellee:
Sake Hibachi Sushi & Bar, Incorporated, Wen Qin Lu, Individually and Amy Chen
Brown et al v. Peanut Plumbing, LLC
as 1:2021cv01155
Plaintiff:
Todd Brown and William Cox
Defendant:
Peanut Plumbing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vazquez v. Brooks
as 4:2021cv00954
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Olvera Vazquez
Defendant:
William F. Brooks doing business as New Beginnings Steel Erection
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Snell v. Sollows
as 4:2021cv01256
Plaintiff:
Tamara Snell
Defendant:
William E. Gene Sollows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boone et al v. Flowers Foods Inc et al
as 5:2021cv03568
Plaintiff:
Brian Charles Boone, Raymond Knight, Jason Craven and others
Defendant:
Flowers Foods, Inc., Flowers Baking Company of Tyler, LLC, Flowers Foods Inc and others
Works et al v. Flowers Foods Inc et al
as 3:2021cv03567
Plaintiff:
Austin Works, Carlton Grigsby, Mack Gordon and others
Defendant:
Flowers Foods, Inc., Flowers Baking Company of Tyler, LLC, Flowers Foods Inc and others
Comeaux v. Directional Project Support, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00887
Plaintiff:
Mark Comeaux
Defendant:
Directional Project Support, Inc. and William Gardner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sessions v. Directional Project Support, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Sessions
Defendant:
Directional Project Support, Inc. and William Gardner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Landry v. Directional Project Support, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
Derrell Landry
Defendant:
Directional Project Support, Inc. and William Gardner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
