Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Callaham v. Quality Farm & Auto, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Roy Callaham
Defendant:
Quality Farm & Auto, Inc. and Batesville Quality Auto Parts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Quintero v. XL Auto Parts LLC
as 3:2022cv01883
Plaintiff:
Alex Quintero
Defendant:
XL Auto Parts LLC doing business as XL Auto Parts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Moreau v. Replacement Parts Inc, et al
as 6:2019cv00651
Defendant:
Crow-Burlingame Co, Bumper to Bumper Auto Parts and Replacement Parts Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Moreau
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vela v. Genuine Parts Company et al
as 4:2018cv01822
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Vela
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company d/b/a NAPA Auto Parts , Danakaty Auto & Truck Supply, Inc. and Jason Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Culver et al v. United Commerce Centers Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01055
Plaintiff:
Steve Wesley Culver and Cassie Charlene Culver
Defendant:
United Commerce Centers Inc , New World International Inc and National Auto Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Padilla v. Discount Used Auto Parts RGV, LLC et al
as 7:2012cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mario Padilla
Defendant:
Discount Used Auto Parts RGV, LLC and Lynn Helmers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez v. Osborn Foreign and American Auto Parts Inc
as 3:2008cv01822
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alvarez and Rodney Alvarez
Defendant:
Osborn Foreign and American Auto Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Sherice Johnson
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Al Wanzelak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Risher v. O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
Joyce Risher
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
