Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Molesi et al v. SAMB, PLLC et al
as 4:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Kalla Molesi, Selena Fowler, Michiyo Couch and others
Defendant:
SAMB, PLLC, Sapna Bindal and Sapan Bindal
Cervenka v. Jumpp Logistics, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cervenka
Defendant:
Jumpp Logistics, LLC and Couch Goat Quandary, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COUCH v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2018cv01229
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Couch
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Couch v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2018cv01160
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Couch
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hawkins v. Texas Auto Crusher et al
as 4:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hawkins and Antonio Page
Defendant:
Texas Auto Crusher , Murray Couch and Nora Couch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hurst v. Texas Auto Crushers, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01654
Plaintiff:
John Hurst
Defendant:
Texas Auto Crushers, Inc. , Murray Couch and Nora Couch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ambre Bodle, et al v. TXL Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 14-20224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMBRE BODLE and LESLIE MEECH
Defendant - Appellee:
TXL MORTGAGE CORPORATION and WILLIAM DALE COUCH, Individually
Hurst et al v. Texas Auto Crushers, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00863
Plaintiff:
John Hurst , Johnny Hawkins and Antonio Page
Defendant:
Texas Auto Crushers, Inc., Murray Couch and Nora Couch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hitzfelder v. TXL Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Hitzfelder
Defendant:
TXL Mortgage Corporation and William Dale Couch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bodle et al v. TXL Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv01515
Plaintiff:
Ambre Bodle, Leslie Meech and Lori Prince
Defendant:
William Dale Couch and TXL Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
