Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Villatoro v. MI Windows and Doors LLC
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Villatoro
Defendant:
MI Windows and Doors, LLC and MI Windows and Doors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Jones et al v. The Green Door Company, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Allen Jones , Richard A. Way , Chandler Shaw and others
Defendant:
The Green Door Company, LLC, William Alan Hopkins and Melissa Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lysne v. Louisiana Windows and Doors, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2017cv01612
Defendant:
Louisiana Windows and Doors, L.L.C., Bailey Shivers and Todd Tauzin
Plaintiff:
James O. Lysne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
REDMON v. GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. d/b/a AMERICAS ALLIANCE d/b/a AMERICAS CHOICE GARAGE DOOR SERVICE et al
as 4:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Bryan Redmon
Defendant:
GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. d/b/a AMERICAS ALLIANCE d/b/a AMERICAS CHOICE GARAGE DOOR SERVICE and INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carver v. TBS Garage Doors Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02140
Plaintiff:
Neil Carver
Defendant:
TBS Garage Doors Inc and Peter Kohut
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Summers v. Rick's Front Door Refinishing, LLC
as 4:2016cv01563
Plaintiff:
Tim Summers
Defendant:
Rick's Front Door Refinishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Moody v. Wilson Plywood & Door Incorporated
as 3:2015cv02982
Plaintiff:
Howard John Moody
Defendant:
Wilson Plywood & Door Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Brown v. Atrium Windows and Doors Inc
as 3:2013cv04819
Plaintiff:
Ivonne Brown
Defendant:
Atrium Windows and Doors Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Anderson v. Peterman Door & Hardware et al
as 4:2008cv00751
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Anderson and Charles Ray Anderson
Defendant:
Peterman Door & Hardware and Pierre Peterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
