Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dorton et al v. Rushing et al
as 1:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dorton and Brian W. Davis
Defendant:
Ray Rushing and Mike Reeser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. S&B Engineers and Constructors, Ltd. et al
as 4:2020cv01959
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo F Portillo, Aubrey W Davis, Kathi L Goedrich and others
Defendant:
Vestek Industries, LLC, Jeffrey Gilgenbach, Alan Konieczka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Davis, IV v. USW Local 13-423
as 18-40259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE W. DAVIS, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCAL 13-423, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED, INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
Alexis et al v. Citgo Petroleum Corp
as 2:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
Mark Alexis , Victor Baff , Dorian Botley and others
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis, IV v. USW Local 13-423
as 1:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis, IV
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, Local Number 13-423
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis vs. ConocoPhillips et al
as 7:2011cv00034
Defendant:
Burlington Resources, Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company
Plaintiff:
Don W Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Adam Davis v. SVC Manufacturing, Inc.
as 10-10429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM W. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SVC MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED, doing business as Gatorade Company & Quaker Oats Company
Jones v. Five Star Asset Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv02343
Plaintiff:
Billy Jones
Defendant:
Five Star Asset Protection, LLC and Cedric W. Davis, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. SVC Manufacturing Inc
as 3:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
Adam W Davis
Defendant:
SVC Manufacturing Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
