Cases 101 - 109 of 109
Chen v. Mueller et al
as 3:2007cv02018
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Chen, MD
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Michael B Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stanietzky et al v. Mueller et al
as 3:2007cv01778
Plaintiff:
Nir Stanietzky, MD and Stephanie Goldbaum, MD
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Peter D Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Baig v. Mueller et al
as 3:2007cv01779
Plaintiff:
Imran Baig, MD and Imran Baig, MD
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Peter D Keisler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garrido et al v. Mueller et al
as 3:2007cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sergio Garrido and Sandra Selene Millan
Defendant:
Robert S Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff and David Roark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Mueller et al
as 4:2007cv02213
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Chen
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sunesara et al v. Roark et al
as 4:2007cv01869
Plaintiff:
Amirali Sunesara, Mumtaz Sunesara and Anish Sunesara
Defendant:
David Roark, Emelio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Imran v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007cv01867
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Imran
Defendant:
Sharon A. Hudson, David Roark, Emelio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Huang v. Muller et al
as 4:2007cv00567
Petitioner:
Wei Huang and Lu Wang
Respondent:
Robert S Mueller, Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
