Cases 111 - 120 of 1,826
Trevino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Younger v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02222
Plaintiff:
Wesley Younger
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nunez-Reynoso v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ellis v. USA
as 22-10729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla A. Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Michael Caravajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Powell et al
as 4:2022cv01767
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alan Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Powell, Hiromichi Kobayashi, Michael Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Fed Bureau of Prisons
as 22-30349
Petitioner / Appellant:
Frederick Hamilton Banks
Respondent / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Sekou Ma'at
Orr v. USA
as 22-30300
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Ma'at
Bush v. Watson
as 22-40418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yusuf O. Bush
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. Watson, Unit Personnel Hansen, Lieutenant, Unit Personnel Maze and others
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
Warden Hijar and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
