Cases 121 - 130 of 241
Mahler v. Fox
as 1:2010cv00031
Petitioner:
Shawn Mahler
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosalez v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Asis Fortino Rosalez
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons, John B Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sweeney v. Fox
as 1:2009cv01020
Petitioner:
James Sweeney
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Don Harper v. John Fox, et al
as 09-41234
Petitioner - Appellant:
DON A. HARPER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Warden and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Taylor v. Fox et al
as 1:2009cv00961
Petitioner:
Willie Taylor, III
Respondent:
John B Fox, R Smith and M Argersinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00964
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pinkett v. Fox et al
as 1:2009cv00933
Petitioner:
Derrick R Pinkett
Respondent:
John B Fox and Stacy Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marlin v. Davee et al
as 1:2009cv00929
Plaintiff:
Michael D Marlin
Defendant:
Sam Davee, Francisco Quintana, John B Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reader v. Fox et al
as 1:2009cv00915
Plaintiff:
Arthur Charles Reader
Defendant:
John B Fox, UP Locicfro, K Ashler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Fox et al
as 1:2009cv00900
Plaintiff:
Leroy Porter
Defendant:
John B. Fox, D. Gonzalez, John White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
