Cases 161 - 170 of 641
Gil v. Crockett et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Unknown Black Female Lt., Jeremy Chance, Latisha Baraka and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Dennis et al
as 5:2020cv00371
Defendant:
Wade Dennis and C.R. England, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hugo Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Wade Parson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicks et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc., EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Lone Star Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nikko Henderson, David Murphy, Jeffrey Laib and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams v. US Bank National Association
as 3:2020cv00192
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Wade P Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00807
Defendant:
Harris County Jail, Houston Police Department, Assistant District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wade Brooks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks, II v. United States Courthouse et al
as 4:2020cv00613
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL and United States Courthouse
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wade Brooks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv00676
Defendant:
Harris County Jail and U.S. District Court
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wade Brooks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Los Santos et al v. Bosworth et al
as 3:2020cv00461
Defendant:
Hon. Danny Chambers, Hon. Sydney Hewlett, Hon. Robert Mayfield and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Reynaldo A. De Los Santos and Mr. Ricardo De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poe v. Zook
as 3:2020cv00101
Respondent:
K Zook
Petitioner:
Wade Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
