Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2018cv00223
Defendant:
FNU Spurlock, FNU Scott, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2018cv03353
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, FNU Scott, FNU Spurlock and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2018cv03112
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, FNU Scott, FNU Spurlock and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wesch v. Asay et al
as 5:2018cv00676
Defendant:
Officer FNU Scott and Sargent FNU Asay
Plaintiff:
David J. Wesch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Princella Steels v. TDCJ, et al
as 17-50558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRINCELLA V. STEELS
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, DOCTOR FNU SCOTT, Dentist and DENTIST AT SKYVIEW
Steels v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00466
Defendant:
Dentist at Skyview, Dr. FNU Scott and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Princella V. Steels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Stephens et al
as 6:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
William Stephens, Edgar D Baker, Jr, Lisa Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. McPeak et al
as 5:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia
Defendant:
Cathy McPeak, Rachel H Smalling, Jacob L Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Altamirano v. Scott
as 5:2015cv00403
Petitioner:
Janie Altamirano
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
FNU Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Walter et al
as 5:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Walter, G.I. Department, FNU Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
