Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Bencivenga Corporation d/b/a OFM Corporation et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 4:2023cv03887
Plaintiff:
Bencivenga Corporation d/b/a OFM Corporation
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Merrick Garland, Steven M. Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Watterson v. ATF
as 23-40556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Blake J. Watterson
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
National Association for Gun Rights, Inc. et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
National Association for Gun Rights Inc, Texas Gun Rights, Inc., Patrick Carey and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Colmenero v. Dettelbach
as 23-10802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angela Colmenero, Attorney General, State of Texas, David Schnitz, Tracy Martin and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity as Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Incorporated, Gun Owners for Safety, Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund and others
National Rifle Association v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 23-10707
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Regina Lombardo, in her offical capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
National Rifle Association of America
The National Rifle Association of America Inc v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
The National Rifle Association of America, Inc. and The National Rifle Association of America Inc
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Gun Rights, Inc et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
as 4:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Texas Gun Rights, Inc and National Association for Gun Rights Inc.
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Polymer80 v. Garland
as 23-10527
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Polymer80, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, In his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, In his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 23-10463
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his Official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
