Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Julio Medina-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60483
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDINA-GARCIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Abrhan Urvina-Garcia
as 14-50628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ABRHAN ADRIAN URVINA-GARCIA, also known as Cesar Flores-Garcia, also known as Abrhan Garcia-Urvina
USA v. Cesar Garcia-Hernandez
as 14-50526
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CESAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Cesar Garcia, also known as Empedorles Vega, also known as Cesar Garcia-Sutuy, also known as Cesar Evaristo Garcia-Sutuy
Hernandez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2013cv00148
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Cesar E Garcia
Plaintiff:
Greysol Janeth Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conde v. Garcia et al
as 4:2013cv02476
Plaintiff:
Hugo Humberto Conde
Defendant:
Cesar M Garcia and La Montana Meat Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Adams et al v. Brock Services, Ltd.
as 1:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Matthew Adams , All Plaintiffs , Rios Manuel Alaniz and others
Defendant:
Brock Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cesar Garcia-Aguilera v. USA, et al
as 10-50574
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESAR VALENTIN GARCIA-AGUILERA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cesar Garcia-Aguilera v. USA, et al
as 10-50523
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESAR VALENTIN GARCIA-AGUILERA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Garcia-Aguilera v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00024
Respondent:
B.O.P., United States Of America and Warden
Petitioner:
Cesar Valentin Garcia-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Cesar Flores-Garcia
as 09-50829
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CESAR FLORES-GARCIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
