Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Coleman et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 6:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Billie Coleman and David Coleman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Ozark Materials, LLC
as 2:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 doing business as Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Ozark Materials, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Galata Chemicals, LLC
as 2:2020cv01381
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Defendant:
Galata Chemicals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Poke Loa - Harahan, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Poke Loa Old Metairie, Poke Loa - Harahan, LLC, Poke Loa - Mandeville, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation, et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
as 5:2019cv01246
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2019cv00881
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bullard v. Marker et al
as 1:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bullard
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2, Inc. and Dayna Marker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Young v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 3:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Robert Young, Jr
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 5:2017cv00896
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
