Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Kennedy v. Chief Judge et al
as 3:2018cv02624
Defendant:
Chief Judge, United States Magistrate Judges, United States District Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv00221
Respondent:
Associate Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Judge Carl E. Stewart
Petitioner:
Joseph Dingler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bagby v. King et al
as 5:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Molly C. Dwyer, Chief Judge George H. King, Judge Donna M. Ryu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. King et al
as 3:2013cv00265
Plaintiff:
Cedric W. Bagby
Defendant:
Chief Judge George H. King and Judge Margaret A. Nagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Herrin et al
as 5:2011cv00766
Defendant:
Heriberto Almodovar, Orlando Garcia, Thomas M Herrin and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Douglas
Intervenor Defendant:
United States of America (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Linda D. Finch
as 1:2011mc00236
Appellant:
CW Capital Asset Management LLC
Appellee:
Linda D. Finch
In Re:
Linda D. Finch
Notice Only Party:
Chief Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth and United States Trustee
512:
United States Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02370
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gill v. Neaves et al
as 5:2010mc00657
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Gill, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Neaves and Former Chief Judge William S Sessions
Hale v. Private Security Firm et al
as 3:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
William Hale
Defendant:
Private Security Firm, Chief Judge and Controlling Decision Makers of the US Fed Dist Court for the Northern Dist of Texas Dallas Div
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
