Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,658
Swift v. CIR
as 24-60270
Petitioner: Bernard T. Swift, Jr. and Kathy L. Swift
Respondent: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
NicQuid v. FDA
as 24-60272
Petitioner: NicQuid, L.L.C. and Wood Creek Vapory
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Williams v. Burleson County
as 24-50430
Plaintiff: Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant: Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Burleson County Sheriff, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Mitchell v. O'Malley
as 24-30342
Plaintiff: Kevin Mitchell
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Guido v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00494
Plaintiff: Timothy B. Guido
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00187
Plaintiff: Ashley Reshe Cook
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hunt v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00483
Plaintiff: Brandon David Hunt
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service and IRS Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blair v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv01959
Plaintiff: SANDRA GILBERT BLAIR
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Groves v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 4:2024cv00479
Plaintiff: Benjamin Groves
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. CIR
as 24-60251
Petitioner: Antonio A. Garcia
Respondent: Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?