Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Cuevas v. Credit One Financial
as 1:2016cv00187
Plaintiff: Janice Cuevas
Defendant: Credit One Financial
Cause Of Action: Telecommunication Carrier, Commission and State Regulations
Acker et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 3:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: Willie C. Acker , Elizabeth Arnold , T. Young Bentley and others
Defendant: John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock County, Mississippi v. Gross
as 1:2015cv00364
Plaintiff: Hancock County, Mississippi
Defendant: Michelle Arlene Gross
Third_party_defendant: Hancock County, Mississippi , Anthony Cuevas and Tony Wayne Ladner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cuevas v. USA
as 1:2015cv00325
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Milton Sylvester Cuevas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hope et al v. Bryant et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00234
Plaintiff: Tim Hope , Jonathan Hope , B. C. and others
Defendant: Phil Bryant and Richard Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuevas v. Desilva et al
as 1:2015cv00031
Plaintiff: Theofield Cuevas
Defendant: Steven W. Desilva and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuevas v. USA
as 1:2014cv00162
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Milton Sylvester Cuevas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cuevas v. USA
as 1:2013cv00404
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Wilton Joseph Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cuevas v. Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00089
Plaintiff: Edith A. Cuevas
Defendant: Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. and XYZ Corporation(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acker et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00575
Plaintiff: Emmett Acker , All Plaintiffs , Jeffrey Acker and others
Defendant: Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., Doward Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?