Cases 11 - 20 of 20
USA v. Luis Martinez
as 14-41020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Ernesto Martinez, Jr. v. Hellmich Law Group, PC et al
as 5:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Hellmich Law Group, PC and Kennie Arriolla and Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
USA v. David Martinez
as 14-50908
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Padilla et al v. Arriola et al
as 5:2014cv00453
Defendant:
Kennie Arriola, Craig Inaba, Herman Kinschiner and others
Plaintiff:
Mauro T. Padilla HTG Real Property Management, and All Related Entities, et al., III and Mauro T. Padilla, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Padilla et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2013cv01121
Plaintiff:
HTG Real Property Management Corp. and Mauro T. Padilla, III
Defendant:
Ernesto Martinez, Jr. and Rick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. World Wide Financial Service LLC et al
as 3:2013cv04063
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Martinez
Defendant:
World Wide Financial Service LLC and George Lester
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Edgar Martinez-De Leon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-60357
Petitioner:
EDGAR ERNESTO MARTINEZ-DE LEON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00862
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Edgar Martinez-De Leon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60012
Petitioner:
EDGAR ERNESTO MARTINEZ-DE LEON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
