Cases 11 - 20 of 568
Gallegos v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gallegos
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Salazar-Elliott v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Liza Salazar-Elliott
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Howard et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Nathan Howard and Marija Howard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Loftice v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Charles Loftice
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Barnett v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dalton Barnett
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Lewis Motor Company doing business as Hawg Country Auto, Cavenaugh Ford Lincoln LLC doing business as Cavenaugh Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Enright, Jr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv07129
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Enright, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fontenot v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Devin Michael Fontenot
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gaines v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Victoria Gaines
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 - Deceptive Trade Practices Act
Menard et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
Duston Daniel Menard and Amber Rourk Menard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Foster v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Paul Foster
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
