Cases 11 - 20 of 155
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Carroll v. Allen
as 4:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joan Carroll
Defendant:
Brandon Allen and Brandon Allen doing business as Jersey Lilly Silver & Stone
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
Daley v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv03106
Plaintiff:
Steven L Daley
Defendant:
New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company and Vikram Seoni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Boss Exotics LLC v. Best Enclosed LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Boss Exotics LLC
Defendant:
Best Enclosed LLC, Pavel Banari, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae:
Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Defense Distributed v. Platkin
as 22-50669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Defense Distributed and Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee:
Matt Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, In His Official Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
