Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 3:2013cv00219
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew David Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Kron v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 13-30272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON J. KRON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, Secretary, STEVE RADER, Regional Warden, ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden and others
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden, KEITH BICKHAM, Deputy Warden, DARRYL MIZELL, Captain and others
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, KEITH BICKHAM, MICHAEL BARBER and others
Wetzel v. Williams et al
as 5:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Bryan Williams, Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 5:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Michael Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Michael Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
