Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Bridges et al v. Jayco Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00569
Plaintiff:
Sandra B. Bridges , Frederick Bridges , Tracey Davison and others
Defendant:
Jayco Enterprises, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders et al v. Insulation Sources, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02347
Plaintiff:
George Michael Sanders , Melanie Rueffer and Ed Edwards
Defendant:
Insulation Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. JW JETCORP, LTD
as 2:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Michael Sanders
Defendant:
JW JETCORP, LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
McManus et al v. Coco Resources, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00332
Plaintiff:
Ethel Marie Bankston, Jeremy Brown, Jerry Curley and others
Unknown:
Eric J. O'Bell, Eric J. O'Bell, Eric J. O'Bell and others
Defendant:
Coco Resources, Inc. and Goulds Pumps Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sanders v. SVI Management Corporation
as 3:2010cv00562
Plaintiff:
Michael Sanders
Defendant:
SVI Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanders et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08244
Plaintiff:
Michael Sanders, Michael Sanders, Michael Sanders and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicles of Georgia, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders v. Waterwood National Associates LP et al
as 3:2009cv01940
Plaintiff:
Michael Sanders
Defendant:
Waterwood National Associates LP and Club Consultants Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Acosta et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02705
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Acosta, Deconja Alexander, John Ellis Andes and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
