Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Donald Burgo v. Kim Stansbury, et al
as 17-30994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD BURGO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM STANSBURY, JAMES MCLELLAND, PAUL JOSEPH DEMAHY and others
USA v. Paul Viola
as 17-30950
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH VIOLA
Donald Burgo v. Kim Stansbury, et al
as 17-30917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD BURGO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM STANSBURY, JAMES MCLELLAND, PAUL JOSEPH DEMAHY and others
Burgo v. Stansbury et al
as 6:2017cv00813
Plaintiff:
Donald Burgo
Defendant:
Kim Stansbury , James McLelland, Paul Joseph DeMahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Lair, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10355
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH LAIR, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Paul Zeedyk v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20753
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH ZEEDYK
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lair, Jr. v. Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID
as 4:2015cv00816
Petitioner:
Paul Joseph Lair, Jr.
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Shoemaker v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-41382
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH SHOEMAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Burgo v. Stansbury et al
as 6:2014cv03452
Plaintiff:
Donald Christopher Burgo
Defendant:
Kim P Stansbury, Sostenes Ruiz, III, Mary Sampey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgo v. Stansbury et al
as 2:2014cv02658
Plaintiff:
Donald Burgo
Defendant:
Kim Stansbury, James McLelland, Paul Joseph DeMahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
